The White House: The 2014 State of The Union Address

.
Source:The New Democrat 

I thought President Obama gave a very good speech tonight that the American people probably enjoyed hearing. Even if it is the smallest audience to listen to one of his State of the Union’s. But I’m not sure it was a speech that will move the country behind his agenda and get the Republican controlled House of Representatives to move on it or move on anything that will boost the economy. Or something that Congressional Democrats and candidates can use to run on and get elected and reelected in November by itself. That he still has a lot more work to do.

The stuff that Americans tend to agree on that unites us was good. Talking about the troops and the need to support them and the fact we’ve ended our longest war in Afghanistan and one of our longest wars in Iraq. But you expect to hear a president to say these things and they always get good applause. But the test is can the president move the country behind his agenda or not and get Americans that he tends to count on and new Americans skeptical about him to say, “you know what the president is right on these issues and we should help his get these things passed in Congress.” I didn’t hear that tonight.

The Republican House of Representatives position on economic growth is very clear. Anything that requires the Federal Government to spend money that is not business or individual tax relief related is dead on arrival in the House. But President Obama wants new national infrastructure plan and new educational and job training opportunities for the long-term unemployed and for low-skilled workers. Those things cost money, but what he has going for him is the Democratic Senate. And instead of trying to push Congress as a whole on these issues, President Obama should focus on the Senate and see if he can and Leader Harry Reid can get anything done there.

To put it bluntly if the House Republican Leadership wants to take 2014 off as far as doing their day-to-day jobs and sit on their asses and just concentrate on electing more representatives, the hell with them if I’m President Obama. “And I’m going to run against a Do Nothing House in public. As I and Vice President Joe Biden are working very hard behind the scenes with the Democratic controlled Senate to move my agenda there and try to get some things passed that country will support.” And the more they get passed over there, the more they’ll have to run on in 2014. That would be my advice to President Obama and Leader Reid and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.

Posted in Barack Obama Presidency, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

VOA News: Thomas Mann: President Obama to Urge Action on The Economy in State of The Union Speech

.
Source:The New Democrat

“It’s The Economy Stupid!” President Obama should spend eighty to ninety percent of the State of the Union speech on the economy and this is what Democrats would do to jumpstart economic and job growth that benefits everyone. Including things like more education and job training for low-skilled workers and the long-term unemployed and making work pay more than not working. With a minimum wage increase to the point that a worker could make more with a job like that than not working. A new national infrastructure plan, things that in past at least garnered bipartisan support. There are a lot of good things that we could do for the economy right now that at least in the past not only brought bipartisan support in Congress, but good ideas from both Democrats and Republicans. And these are the things that President Obama should try to move Congress on.

Posted in The New Democrat, VOA News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Associated Press: Today in History For January 26th

Source:The New Democrat

1998 the year that could’ve been for President Bill Clinton that instead turned out to be the year that wasn’t. Because a fifty-year old man couldn’t get enough of a White House intern. A year where he wanted to reform and shore up entitlement programs, expand pensions and health insurance. He had a very big agenda going into 1998, but that all gone because of an affair he had with an intern. Just goes to show how stupid he was to have this affair and everything that he cost himself and his party as. A result that again going into 1998 probably had an opportunity to win back the House of Representatives. Bill Clinton similar to Richard Nixon had more than his share of enemies in the opposition party. People who were simply looking to bring them down. Where Nixon and Clinton made mistakes was to give them the hammers to hit them with their own personal behavior.

Bill Clinton, I don’t want to say is the Jack Kennedy of his generation when it came to his sexual appetite. Because lets face it, JFK was a morbidly obese man when it came to sexual activity. Had he not had this little job as President of the United States, perhaps the only thing he would’ve had done was to have sex. And maybe there would be a hundred little JFK’s running around today with perhaps a hundred different mothers, with the Jack being the father of all of them. Bill Clinton (at least as far as we know) didn’t have sex with a different women every time he was out-of-town on his own, or when Hillary went out-of-town on her own. But when President Clinton saw a women and in Monica Lewinski’s case, a teenage girl as far as how cute she was and maturity level that he liked, he made his move.

And without the Paula Jones bogus lawsuit, I mean seriously why would a man as handsome, charming, funny and intelligent as Bill Clinton, want anything to do with Paula Jones. Especially when he already had Jennifer Flowers which was a real affair. But putting that all aside for a minute, without her lawsuit against the President, Monica Lewinski’s name is probably never famous. She didn’t want this story to come out. And President Clinton for obvious as water is wet reasons didn’t want this story to come out either. The whole Monica affair just reminds me of how stupid even the most brightest and politically gifted people can be when they don’t have discipline. And that is one thing that Bill Clinton will always have in common with Jack Kennedy.

Posted in AP Video, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Foreign Affairs: Kevan Harris: ‘How to Reform Iran’s Theocracy’

Source:The New Democrat

Before the Islāmic Revolution in Iran in the late 1970s Iran was already an authoritarian state, but in the form of a monarchy under Mohammad Reza Pahlavi who was the Shah of Iran. Who was basically their king who ruled this large country for about forty years as a dictator. His governing style was similar to that of Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, but Shah Pahlavi was more progressive on economic policy. And did a lot to develop this very underdeveloped country when he came to power. And gave the country a functioning economy and infrastructure system. But this guy was hardly a Liberal or a Democrat, but an autocrat who believed in economic development.

Again Iran was certainly not a liberal democracy or a democracy in any form before 1979. They had a dictatorship that went out of their way to squash any form of political opposition whether it was democratic or theocratic. And some of the Iranians who came to power in 1979 as part of that Islāmic Revolution did time in Shah Pavlavi’s jails and prisons and victims of his secret service and other security services that the West helped finance. Because they did not want to see these Islāmic Theocrats come to power in Iran. But what Iran did have was a functioning economy and a growing middle class and an education system that allowed for everyone in Iran to succeed in life. And one more thing, they weren’t under economic sanctions from the West because the Shah was a partner.

A lot of the economic progress that Iran made under the Shah is almost gone now. They still have a modern infrastructure system and education system. That includes for women and ethnic minorities and in many cases Iranian women are freer than Saudi women. But the country because of this socialist authoritarian regime that sort of mixes in autocratic rule under a theocracy where the elected president is not even the head of state and a socialist economic system that is more about state-control than progress with all sorts of state-owned industries failing. And of course with the Islāmic Republic’s continue support of Islāmic terrorists and pursuit of weapons of mass destruction their economy has gone backwards and their currency has lost a lot of value. And a lot of Iranians still live in poverty and have now moved into poverty.

I’m obviously not an expert on Iran, but know enough about the country that if you eliminated the theocratic state-sponsoring terrorist component from their national government and made the elected president the actual head of state with complete responsibility over their executive branch with the cabinet reporting to the president and not what is called the supreme leader who is the dictator of the country, Iran could become a great developed country and the economic power of the Middle East. Along with Saudi Arabia, because Iran is an energy independent country that could become a very reliable energy supplier for Europe and Asia. With an educated class that would further develop the country and create all sorts of new thriving industries in the country.

I believe the model for Iran is the Turkish model of having an independent executive accountable to no one but the voters who would have a Parliament and judiciary to hold each other accountable. A government that uses its vast economic resources to develop the country and empower the people. To be able to manage their own affairs where their people would be free to live their own lives. And not have to worry about their government when they disagree with them. But these are the decisions for Iran the Iranian people to make. But a successful small r republican model is out there for them to take.
Shahzad Raja-BBC News: Iranian Revolution 1979 Fall of a Shah

Posted in Foreign Affairs Video, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Secular Talk: Governor Rick Perry: Decriminalize Pot

.
Source:The New Democrat

Governor Rick Perry a true Federalist at least when it comes to marijuana and not one of these fake Conservatives who like to nationalize social and cultural issues which they see marijuana as one of those issues that must be defeated at all costs. But what Governor Perry is saying as a Federalist that this is an issue that the states can deal with. Since they are closer to their own people and their needs than the Feds and that the Feds should get out-of-the-way. He’s not saying that he’s in favor of marijuana or that he’s suggesting that all states should legalize or decriminalize it. But what’s he’s saying is that this should be left up to each individual state. And states that decriminalize marijuana, the Feds should get out-of-the-way and not try to take over the marijuana enforcement there.

Posted in The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Young Turks: Is President Obama Right About Marijuana?

Source:The New Democrat 

Keep in mind this is coming from one of the safest politicians at least in modern American political history. Who is well-known for looking at all sides and considering all opinions before making a final decision. Whose run his last race for political office and now has the freedom to basically say what he wants with few diplomatic exceptions. And what he’s done here I believe is not just look at the facts when it comes to marijuana, but acknowledging them as well.For a change I agree with a lot of what Cenk Uygur said here. But what I would add is that President Obama is a politician before a leader. He’s a leader, just a safe one who generally doesn’t want to be the first person to go out on a limb and take a big stand on a big issue. But he has led on big issues before. The Great Recession when he first took office, health care reform, Wall Street reform, all uses where he’s paid a big price for. But that have worked out and were the right things to do at the time.

Posted in The New Democrat, TYT | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Associated Press: Kelly Daschle- U.S. Eases Sanctions As Iran Implements Nuke Deal

Source:The New Democrat

This is what happens when you negotiate with a country instead of trying to ignore them as if they do not exist. When you give countries including authoritarian states like Iran incentive to behave well and they are not crazy thinking you are simply trying to destroy them, which the current President of the Islāmic Republic seems to believe that, chances are they will behave. Because these states tend to have one thing and goal in mind. Which is to stay in power and doing things to improve their economy gives them the resources to do that. When you say give up your weapons or else and not really even knowing what else is, let alone prepared to do that, or you just keep in the same sanctions that you’ve had for thirty plus years knowing that Iran can get money from other places, they’ll just say what else. And tempt you to try them.

Associated Press: Kelly Daschle- U.S. Eases Sanctions As Iran Implements Nuke Deal

Posted in AP Video, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The White House: ‘Making 2014 a Year of Action to Expand Opportunities For The Middle Class’

Weekly Address_ Making 2014 a Year of Action to Expand Opportunities for the Middle Class (2014) - Google Search

Source:The White House– President Barack H. Obama (Democrat, Illinois) 44th President of the United States.

Source:The New Democrat

“In this week’s address, President Obama says 2014 will be a year of action, and called on both parties to help make this a breakthrough year for the United States by bringing back more good jobs and expanding opportunities for the middle class.”

From The White House

Let Congressional Republicans only talk about ObamaCare especially in the Senate. Where that is the only thing that Senate Republicans seem to be interested in right now. Even though more Americans are becoming more comfortable with the Affordable Care Act. And let Democrats offer and economic agenda for 2014 that puts millions of Americans back to work. In the areas of infrastructure, energy policy, trade and immigration. 2014 should be about the American economy for the Democratic Party. About how far we’ve come since the Great Recession, the work that still needs to be done. And what Democrats would do to move the economy forward so millions more Americans can benefit and live in freedom as well. As Republicans continue to bash a law that more Americans are becoming more comfortable with everyday.

Posted in Barack Obama Presidency, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The White House: President Obama Speaks on U.S. Intelligence Programs

.

Source:The New Democrat

I have a good Milton Friedman line for President Obama. Without liberty, you can’t have security. And when you lean on the side of security over liberty, you’ve now weaken both. And not just hurt liberty in the country with an oppressive central government, but you’ve also hurt security as well. Because now you have a big government too involved in the people’s lives. And you have them now only having to worry about criminals and perhaps terrorists as well, but now they have to worry about their own government being too involved in their lives. Replacing the threat of terrorism with an oppressive over centralized big government not only hurts people’s freedom by subtracting from it. And creates this authoritarian state that only Neoconservatives would see as a utopia, but it weakens the security as well. And puts the people at odds with their own government.

Posted in Barack Obama Presidency, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Washington Post: Steve Rosenthal: ‘American Politics Are Moving Left’

Americans are looking to the left for solutions

Source:The Washington Post– U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (Democrat, Massachusetts) Hey, Liz, if the Democratic Socialist label is good enough for Bernie Sanders, why not you as well?

“Steve Rosenthal, a longtime Democratic strategist and former political director of the AFL-CIO, is founder and president of the Atlas Project, which provides progressives with research and data. He is also president of the Organizing Group, which creates campaigns for progressive organizations.

Not too long ago, everyone was declaring American politics a lost cause for progressives. The religious right supposedly had a stranglehold on elections. Then it was the tea party that had the political establishment — initially Democrats and Republicans — quaking. The media and the general public took hold of a narrative parroted by conservative candidates and opinion leaders: The United States was a “center-right” nation.

But after two consecutive elections in which the Democratic candidate for president garnered more than 50 percent of the vote — a one-two punch last achieved by Franklin Roosevelt — it is worth questioning that assumption. The country is getting more diverse, and as the proportion of white voters shrinks, so, too, does the conservative base. As demographics shift, so do political preferences — in this case, toward the left. A close examination of U.S. attitudes in the past decade-plus reveals that the United States is steadily becoming more progressive.

It’s been well publicized how America has “evolved” on marriage equality. Washington Post/ABC News polling last year found that, by a margin of 58 percent to 36 percent , people believe their fellow Americans should be able to marry whomever they choose — something that would have been unthinkable less than a decade ago.”

From The Washington Post

“Americans continue to be more likely to identify as conservatives (38%) than as liberals (23%). But the conservative advantage is down to 15 percentage points as liberal identification edged up to its highest level since Gallup began regularly measuring ideology in the current format in 1992.”

071325956a3b84b4052cffe1c7bce973 (1)

Source:The Young Turks– Liberal and Conservative are actually not that different.

From The Young Turks

To talk about liberal, progressive, conservative, socialist, or whatever political label you are talking about, it sure as hell hopes to know what you mean when you are talking about that label. What does that label mean to you. The same thing when you are talking about movies and you are talking about great movies. Well, what do you mean by great movie. What is a great movie to you.

When I think of liberal, I think of someone who believes in liberal democracy. I know that sounds crazy, but when I think of social democrat or democratic socialist, I think of someone who believes in social democracy, not communism. When I think of conservative, I think of someone who is cautious and believes in conserving. Not someone who who is antiestablishment and wants to blow up the establishment of the Republican Party and replace it with a theocratic, nationalistic, authoritarian party. But someone who wants to conserve the American federal republic, the U.S. Constitutional, and our liberal democracy.

Since labels like Socialist have been thrown around in America and lumped in with Communist, that everyone who isn’t on the Far-Left in America, hates, or at least hates communism, people who would be called Social Democrats or just plain Socialists everywhere else, at least in the free democratic world, go by other political labels in America, like liberal or progressive. Even in Europe, Liberals are considered center-right, nor center-left, or left-wing, like the mainstream media considers them in America.

Yes, I believe America is more liberal today, then it even was 10-20 years ago. But not in the stereotypical, mainstream media, pop culture sense of what a Liberal is supposed to be and what they Liberals are supposed to believe in. But liberal in classical (if not real) sense as people who believe in freedom, both personal and economic, as well people who believe in civil liberties and freedom of choice, as well as equality of opportunity and equal justice.

I also think America is more left today, in the social democratic sense, with a lot of Millennial’s who think socialism is cool, similar to how the young Boomers thought socialism was cool in the 1960s and 70s. Politicians like Senator Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, as well as other leftist Democrats, seem to play very well with young people today.

But again, we need to separate liberal from leftist, because they’re not the same things, never have been, and never will be. Real Liberals (or Classical Liberals, if you prefer) look very conservative, at least compared with leftists (democratic or otherwise) ideologically.

Posted in The New Democrat, The Washington Post | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment