The Washington Post: Alyssa Rosenberg: ‘If Conservatives Lost the Culture War, That Doesn’t Mean Liberals Won It’

The New Democrat_ Washington Post_ Alyssa Rosenberg- 'If Conservatives Lost the Culture War, That Doesn't Mean Liberals Won'Source:The Washington Post– with a look at the Cultural War.

Source:The New Democrat 

“The “culture wars” have been a feature of American politics for almost a century, but recently a number of commentators have declared their end. Conservatives have lost, swept aside by a wave of enthusiasm for marriage equality and sexualized mass culture, and so liberals, the reasoning goes, must have won. But conflating the lessons of a winner-take-all political system and the state of pop culture obscures an important point: in television, movies, and music, just because conservative ideals are receding does not mean that liberalism has actually carried the day.

“Liberal social values are deeply embedded in our culture, from pretty much everything on TV outside the Christian channels at the fringe of the channel lineup, to any movie of note,” Markos Moulitsas wrote on April 14. “‘Captain America’ has grossed nearly half a billion in 10 days, with its overtly civil-libertarian and anti-neocon message. I mean, Captain America is saying that a fear-based (read: Republican) foreign policy is not the ‘American Way.’ For a crowd that flinches at any notion of sex, it’s gotta be impossible to escape sexual imagery, from advertising to media to Miley Cyrus’ latest whatever-the-hell she is doing.”

From The Washington Post

When people use the term “Culture War,” it’s not immediately clear what they’re talking about. It could be some pop culture war between Hollywood and Nashville, the capitol of country music, or, perhaps, the broader Bible Belt. Well, that sort of conflict is really not of much significance. A more significant Culture War is in the arena of politics and the way Americans look at life and how they believe they should be living it.

All the evidence you need to know that Liberals won that Culture War is that it’s no longer 1955. We no longer watch black and white TV or get together in the living room to listen to the radio. The man of the house is no longer likely to say, “Honey I’m home,” when he comes home from work, with honey responding “How was your day dear? Your favorite drink is by your chair in the living room.” Honey may not be there. She may still be at work.

This may sound simplistic but we are in a completely different era where both men and women believe that they can do anything they want to if they work hard and get a good education and the skills they need to be successful.

Gone are the days of stereotypical masculine and feminine roles. African-Americans no longer live, for the most part, to serve Caucasian-Americans by working in their homes. Gays are no longer trapped in the closet. Men and women no longer feel that they have to be married in order to have sex or live with their romantic partner and have and rear children.

The 1960s was obviously not a perfect decade but it was a liberating (great liberal word) decade for millions of Americans, thanks to the Baby Boom generation. Today, 40-50 years later, we as a country, at least outside of the Bible Belt, feel that we have the freedom to live our own lives and do as we please without the threat of government or the religious and social establishment interfering. Now, legalized gambling, legalized marijuana, same-sex-marriage, homosexuality, and adult pornography are all mainstream. Bye bye, Billy Graham, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and Phyllis Schaffly. You lost the Culture War.

As much as the Christian Right may want to put the whole country in a time machine and take us back to Leave it to Beaver Land (1955), those days are long gone. America, today, is much more free than it was then and it seeks ever more personal and economic freedom. It is never going back.

Posted in The New Democrat, The Washington Post | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The New Republic: Jonathan Cohn: ‘More Taxes Would Make a Better Society’

Source:The New Democrat 

Well, I guess it is official now, with this piece from Jonathan Cohn, The New Republic (his link is  above)  the classic American liberal magazine is dead.  Or perhaps, it has just been taken over by Socialists or Communists and the Liberals there are now forced to write pieces endorsing big government and critiquing the Right.  Or perhaps the Liberals at TNR were simply kicked out and sent away.  Maybe the TNR Liberals were kidnapped by the new TNR big government statists.

Jonathan Cohn calls tax day a time to celebrate. What’s next?  He and the other big government statists are going to call for making tax day a national holiday or something?  Here’s some helpful information. If you believe middle class Americans are under taxed, which apparently Mr. Cohn does, arguing in his piece today that all Americans except for the working poor should be taxed more, you are not a Liberal. 

People who believe that middle class Americans, auto mechanics, law enforcement workers, teachers, nurses, bus drivers, government workers in general (not including politicians, but Representative Jim Moran disagrees with that) and military personal are under-taxed are, simply, wrong.  These are workers who generally make 40-70 thousand dollars in a good year serving their fellow citizens and their country.  Mr. Cohn, playing the role of Uncle Sam, says,  “I have all of this new government that I want to create at your expense and I need your money. I’m the government and I’m a socialist, its my money to begin with and I’m just nice enough to let you have some of it!”

People who believe that hard-working middle class Americans are under taxed are not liberal and, I  argue, not progressive either.  You don’t hear socialist U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders or progressive senators Tom Harkin and Sherrod Brown calling for increased taxes on middle class Americans.

People who believe that hard working middle class Americans, who technically aren’t poor but who live paycheck to paycheck and will need Social Security to have any type of solid retirement income, are under taxed are socialist, big government, statists.

Posted in The New Democrat, TNR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Slate Magazine: Jamelle Bouie: Jim DeMint, American Abolitionism and Constitutional Conservatives

Source:The New Democrat

Representative Michele Bachmann announced she was running for president in, I believe, August of 2011.  Her  presidential campaign lasted all of four months.  It was one of the shortest presidential campaigns in American history.  When she announced that she was running for president, she called herself a constitutional conservative.  In the same speech, she came out in favor of amending the U.S. Constitution to prohibit pornography and same-sex-marriage. I remember this well because I wrote a blog, then, about her presidential campaign announcement.

At the risk of stating the obvious, it seems to me that if you call yourself a constitutional conservative,  you believe in conserving the U.S. Constitution.  The fundamental meaning of conservatism is the minimization of change. 

When I heard Representative Bachmann describe her politics as constitutionally conservative and then suggest two new constitutional restrictions on personal behavior, I was thinking, “Could this radical and conservative be the same person?”  The U.S. Constitution is one of the most radical liberal documents ever written on the subject of individual rights.  I would expect that a constitutional conservative would want to conserve and protect the constitution, not amend it to curtail individual rights.  It is very clear that Representative Bachmann understands neither the U..S. Constitution nor conservatism.

The real constitutional conservatives of the past were Robert Taft, Barry Goldwater, and Ron Reagan. Those of today are Ron and Rand Paul, the Cato Institute, the American Enterprise Institute, and  Reason Magazine.   The love the United States Constitution for what it is and are not trying to amend or change it.  They want it observed as it is.  They, especially, do not want to give more power to government to control the behavior of individual citizens. 

Posted in Slate Video, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The New Republic: Noam Scheiber: Bed Wetting Leftists: Democrats Who Freak Out Over Setbacks

Source:The New Democrat

There’s a faction in the Democratic Party, the far-left fringe,  as well as the broader far-left in America, who, to put it simply, make the perfect the enemy of the good. Any Democrat who doesn’t give them exactly what they want, which is generally some new tax increase,  federal program, nationalization of a sector of the economy, or rules and regulations about certain private industries, automatically gets labeled as a corporate sellout.

To give you a clearer idea of this faction, they think that eating meat is some type of animal cruelty and cutting down one tree is an environmental  atrocity.  They believe that fathers are not important and that women should rule the world all together, not just be in charge of rearing the kids, also that masculinity should be eliminated all together.

They claim that any type of negative speech is automatically bigotry and that any such speech should be prohibited regardless of any constitutional protections.

They believe that right-wingers should not have a voice in America, that FOX News should be outlawed or nationalized, and that they should be in charge of the media.  They appear to be in favor of   nationalization of  the media. Anyone who thinks that fascism only comes from the right is not very  knowledgable about the American far-left that wants to be in complete control of information dissemination in this country.

The far-left in America are not liberals. They believe that the Neo-Communists running the government in Venezuela are good people, doing a good job  to the point that they shouldn’t have a Democratic opposition.  They believe that  the Democratic opposition in Venezuela should be put in jail.  They also believe that  the far-right in America should be put in jail.

These leftists statists will never have any real power in America  through the liberal democratic process, because they will always be outnumbered by 7-1. or more.  Americans do not want government to have control over their lives, economically or personally.  They do not  believe that women should control the whole country or that Caucasians, from the South and rural America, are all bigots.  As a Democrat myself, I wish they would get the hell out of the Democratic Party and form their own Socialist or Communist party so that the Democratic Leadership would no longer have to listen to them. 

Posted in The New Democrat, TNR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

New America Foundation: ‘The Shot: Reniqua Allen: Civil Rights in Present Day’

The New America Foundation_ 'The Shot_ Reniqua Allen_ Civil Rights in Present Day'Source:New America Foundation– with a look at fair housing in America.

Source:The New Democrat 

“This week marks the anniversary of the 1968 Civil Rights Act –intended as a follow-up to the 1964 Act — and emphasized equal opportunity in housing. Above, 2012 New America Fellow Reniqua Allen explains why even today, owning a home is still elusive for many in the African American community.

CORRECTION: A previous version of The Shot misidentified the anniversary of the Fair Housing Act.”

From New America Foundation

I just want to correct the record on something that Reniqua Allen said in her video: it’s not minorities in general that have issues with let’s say the majority population in America, when it comes to decent, affordable housing. It’s African-Americans, when you are talking about minorities.

Asian and Middle Eastern Americans, aren’t suffering from a lack of decent and affordable housing in America. American-Indians, yes but for obvious reasons having to do with the fact that they’re still on reservations, in the middle of nowhere, under the jurisdiction of the Federal Government, living in extremely underdeveloped parts of the country. Similar to Anglo-Saxon and Dutch-Americans living in Appalachia.

If you count Latino as a race in America, that would be very difficult, since Latinos are of either pure European background, mostly Spanish, or they are of mix race and ethnicity, which is very common with Latino-Americans, who in many cases tend to be of both European and West-Indian background, or European and African background, or a mixture of all these races into one. But Latino by itself is not a race. Similar to Scandinavian, or Slavic, or Australian, it’s more of an ethnic division.

The 1968 Fair Housing Law was one of the best acts of the civil rights era of the 1960s. It said that if you serve the public selling and renting homes, the public is the public and it includes everyone. People can’t be denied housing in the United States simply because of their race. This followed the 1964 Civil Rights Act that banned racial discrimination and the 1965 Voting Rights Act that banned racial discrimination in voting, as well.

The lack of adequate housing for African-Americans today is not about race but about education and good jobs. Too many African-Americans do not have them compared, with the rest of the country. Poor, rural, Caucasian-Americans and American-Indians also lack them. These things are due to the lack of quality education and economic development in these communities. People in these communities are not denied quality housing because of their race.

If you want to close the housing gap between low-income Americans of any race or ethnicity and middle class and wealthy Americans, you have to close the education and achievement gap and provide better schools and educational opportunities for low-income Americans, regardless of race or ethnicity. Kids who are in school now and their low-skilled, low-income parents need better education and opportunity.

Posted in New America Foundation, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Drew Carey: Whose Line Weird Newscasters

Source:The New Democrat

“Whose Line is it Anyway?” for anyone who’s interested in the full title of the show and, if you are,  you probably keep score at home when you are watching bowling on TV.  This is a show that is almost completely off the cuff.  Four comedians or comedic actors on stage are given scenes to act out. Sounds simple enough, right?  The trick is that they have to act out these scenes as strange characters.

Weird Newscasters is a perfect example.  Two comedians are pretending to be news anchors but they have to play these anchors as weird characters.  One is an alcoholic who won’t let the bar close down before he gets at least one more drink. One is a weatherman who’s doing the weather as a construction worker who gets turned on every time he sees a woman walk by.  Another is a sportscaster who lets out big belches every time he talks about sports.

That’s what you see in this scene.  This is a show that I would love to do myself or, at least, play the game.  I could give myself my own character to play or take what is given to me.  I would love to play the anchor of the 3 am news and call it the Insomniac News Hour, or something like that.  There would be breaking news about Lindsay Lohan being pulled over for speeding and then a cut to “The Insomniac Classic Movie, “Attack of the Killer Lettuce,” or something stupid like that.

This is my favorite game on Whose Line because it doesn’t look a lot different from what actually passes as news today.  They go on for days about things that should be one day stories or only be given brief mentions.  Instead, they’re still being covered a week later by the same people and shows.  News about Justin Bieber replaces really important issues like government spying on Americans and privacy. Today if you watch The Onion or Whose Line you might get the same amount of real information as you get from CNN, MSNBC or FNC.

Posted in Life, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Drew Carey: Whose Line SuperHeros- Made Up, Don’t Exist

 

48295

Source:Drew Carey– Comedian Colin Mochrie 

Source:The New Democrat

Who’s Line is it Anyway had a segment called Superheros in which several comedian contestants played made up, non-existent (even in Hollywood), SuperHeros.  To begin, one contestant would be given the beginning of a scenario about some made up crisis.  For example, “Oh no, we are all out of Starbucks coffee,” or ketchup, “What am I going to do?  I’d better call my SuperHero friends to help me out!”

The first actor would make up a SuperHero name and play a role that the host, Drew Carey, would pick from many suggestions given by the audience.  An additional actor would join the ensemble every thirty seconds or so. The first actor would give the second actor a made up SuperHero name and the second actor would give the third actor a made up SuperHero name.  The plot would be improvised in real time until all of the actors were involved.

So you would see four actors with these crazy SuperHero names and lets say the crisis is no more Starbucks coffee in the entire world. The first SuperHero would be Caffeine Addict Boy or something like that and he would bring in Latte Girl and she would bring in Alcoholic Man telling them that the situation is okay because he has a ten year supply of scotch and bourbon so no one will go thirsty. And somehow all of these clowns would save the day and things would go back to normal for them.

Drew Carey: Whose Line- SuperHeroes

Posted in Life, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gore Vidal: Myra Breckinridge (1970) Starring Raquel Welch

Rotten Tomatoes_ MYRA BRECKINRIDGE (1970) - Google Search

Source:Rotten Tomatoes– Raquel Welch is Myra Breckinridge.

Source:The New Democrat

“Myron Breckinridge (Rex Reed) flies to Europe to get a sex-change operation and is transformed into the beautiful Myra (Raquel Welch). She travels to Hollywood, meets up with her rich Uncle Buck (John Huston) and, claiming to be Myron’s widow, demands money. Instead, Buck gives Myra a job in his acting school. There, Myra meets aspiring actor Rusty (Roger Herren) and his girlfriend, Mary Ann (Farrah Fawcett). With Myra as catalyst, the trio begin to outrageously expand their sexual horizons.”

From Rotten Tomatoes

“After undergoing gender reassignment surgery, an aspiring actress travels to Hollywood, where she also wants to make a claim on her wealthy uncle’s estate.”

MYRA BRECKINRIDGE (1970) Theatrical Trailer - Mae West, John Huston, Raquel Welch

Source:Biggest Trailer Database– Raquel Welch as Myra Breckinridge.

From Biggest Trailer Database

Myra Breckinridge may be the best movie that ever flopped at the box office. It lost more than the 1962 New York Mets who lost something like 120 games that season. I don’t believe the movie made a dime or anyone gave a damn. It was too far ahead of its time. If it were made today with the right cast, it would probably be a huge success.

Raquel Welch plays Myra Breckinridge and really makes the movie worth watching all by herself. Watching her, it is very difficult to look at anyone or anything else. She is at her hottest, sexiest, cutest and funniest. She shows the world that she is much more than a hot and sexy babe. She has great wit and stage presence.

Myra is a former gay man who is now a transgender woman. She goes to Hollywood to claim what she believes to be her inheritance. Her uncle, Buck Loner (John Huston), an over-sexed, horny bastard (which could’ve been called The Horny Bastard) runs an acting school that he inherited from his parents. Myra thinks that he owes her half of it.

Buck has no idea that his nephew, his sister Gertrude’s son, is now a woman calling herself Myra Breckinridge. She tells her uncle to pay up or she’s going to a get a lawyer to get what she believes is hers.

To buy time, Buck gives Myra a job on the school faculty. He tries to prove that Myra never married his nephew and that he doesn’t owe her anything. He’s right that she never married his nephew. She is his nephew and she’s now a woman. She has a fake marriage license that keeps her in the game until she can get what she really wants, the five-hundred-thousand dollars that she believes her uncle owes her.

While Myra is trying to get her money, she uses her time at the school to do research on modern young straight men with the goal of dominating them, one day. This movie is hysterical. It has all sorts of funny characters including a gay man who plays the part of the queen perfectly. There’s also a very young, baby-faced, Farah Fawcett who’s actually cuter than Raquel, but not as sexy.

I’m not saying that Myra Breckinridge is the best comedy or best produced comedy of all-time. I’m saying that it’s 90 minutes of a lot of fun and laughs. Most of those laughs and fun being intentional. And besides, it stars Raquel Welch. Do you really need any other motivation to watch it?

Posted in Classic Movies, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Alfred Hitchcock: North by Northwest (1959)

Source:The New Democrat

North by Northwest is my favorite movie of all time.  Cary Grant is my favorite actor of all time and Alfred Hitchcock is probably my favorite director of all time.  I have a couple versions of this movie on DVD, saw it on Turner Classic Movies a couple of nights ago and again on  DVD last might.  I decided to write a blog about it today because I’ve been thinking about it a lot. This movie is Cary Grant, perhaps the best comedic actor of all time, at his best.

North by Northwest has all the ingredients of a great Hitchcock movie. A great plot, great writing, great cast,  Hitchcock’s sense of humor, that Cary Grant shares, and James Mason. The very sexy and beautiful Eva Marie Saint (On the Waterfront, The Russians are Coming) has a big role in the movie. According to my father, she’s smarter, sexier, and more beautiful than Grace Kelly or Marilyn Monroe.  She reminds him of my mother.

Then, there’s Jessie Royce Landis who plays Roger Thornhill’s (Cary Grant) mother, a great smart ass,  even though she’s only four years older.

The movie is a Cold War thriller about a man, Van Damme (James Mason), who exports American weapons and national security secrets.  Thornhill gets caught up in it, accidentally, and you have a great movie.

Thornhill is a charming playboy New York advertising man who’s just living his life as a very successful businessman.  He’s kidnapped by Van Damme’s henchmen at a New York bar.  They believe he has inside information about Van Damme’s organization.

The Van Damme crew tries to murder Thornhill but he gets away.  He tries to get back in touch with Van Damme and instead connects with Lester Townsend, someone Van Damme had pretended to be.  The Van Damme crew, trying to murder Thornhill, instead murder Townsend.  They believe he also knows something about their organization that they want kept secret.  Thornhill is now not only on the run from Van Damme and company but also fron the NYC PD, the New York State PD, and  the Feds.

Thornhill once again escapes and is now on the run from everyone because of the murder he didn’t commit.  This time, he escapes by train where he meets Eve Kendall (Eva Marie Saint) who just happens to be an undercover Federal agent pretending to work for Philipp Van Damme.  She’s actually working to bring down Van Damme’s and his organization.  She has Thornhill believing she’s on his side and helping him to escape.  She’s actually just using him.

This movie starts in New York, moves to Chicago and then Indiana where the Van Damme crew tries to murder Thornhill and Thornhill is trying to meet the real George Kaplan to find out what this whole thing is about. The problem is that George Kaplan doesn’t exist.  Back to Chicago Thornhill gets arrested again, thinking that he would be safer with the police than on the run. The Feds grab him instead and use him to help bering down Van Damme and company in Rapid City where Philipp Van Damme has a home.

This is one of the best action suspense comedies you’ll ever see.

Posted in Classic Hitch, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The New Republic: Issac Chotner: ‘Ross Douhat Column on Young People: Individualism & Liberalism’

Isaac Chotiner_ Ross Douthat Column on Young People_ Individualism and Liberalism (2014) - Google SearchSource:The New Republic– I guess this would be young people in America.

Source:The New Democrat 

This just in: the Far-Left in America (The New Republic included) doesn’t like anything that Ross Douhat or any other Conservative or real Liberal has to say about anything. If you don’t believe check out Issac Chotner’s column at The New The New Republic, if you don’t mind paying for what you read. I guess some Socialists in life believe that not everything in life should be free.

This blog talks a lot about labels, especially what they mean in politics.  Thus, when I read a column in the  New Republic, that no longer looks like that great liberal magazine that once questioned the influence of governmental power in personal and economic lives, but now post columns that support both the welfare state and the nanny state, I feel the need to reply.

Young people love big government?  Do you really see a call for higher taxes, more centralized government  programs, and expansion of the war on drugs from young adults?  Do you hear them saying that legalizing same-sex-marriage would be a horrible mistake that would ruin our national moral fiber, that we not only need to outlaw same-sex-marriage but outlaw homosexuality all together?  Are they saying that privacy is dangerous and we need to prohibit not only currently illegal drugs but also currently legal drugs, e.g., like sugar, caffeine, alcohol, and tobacco.

The polling data from my Generation, X, and Generation Y show that big government is not popular with these people.  They want the freedom to make their own decisions.  They don’t want a nanny state trying to run their lives for them or a welfare state making most of their economic decisions for them.

Medicare, Social Security, Unemployment Insurance, help for the needy, public education, etc., such government programs at one level or another have always been popular and I imagine that they always will be.  These are social insurance programs for people who need them.  They intrude into personal space much less than a welfare or nanny state that seeks to manage the life of every citizen.

The future of American politics lies with the Ron Paul Libertarians on the Right, who may save the Republican Party from itself and eventually take control of it, and want government almost completely out of our lives, and the Brian Schweitzer (former governor of Montana) liberals on the center-right who believe in the safety net with equal rights and protections for all Americans, including  personal choice and autonomy over our personal lives.  Neither of these groups wants the government to try to run our lives for us.

However, the Bernie Sanders Socialists and the Social Democrats on the far-left have their supporters and followers.  They, and the real welfare-staters, want to see a big, centralized, social democratic  government in this country. But they aren’t a governing faction and will never be as long as they are putting down private enterprise and capitalism and trying to convince the middle class that they are under-taxed and that government simply needs more of their hard earn money.

Posted in The New Democrat, TNR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment