Gorgeous Celebs: ‘The Best of Raquel Welch’

Gorgeous Celebs_ 'The Best of Raquel Welch' (1)

Source:Gorgeous Celebs– Hollywood Goddess Raquel Welch, during Myra Breckinridge.
Source:The New Democrat

“Second Raquel Welch video.
Please comment, if you have time.
Best Viewed in HD, video maybe slow depending upon connection.”

From Gorgeous Celebs

If you are not just familiar with the film Myra Breckinridge, but perhaps seen if a few times (maybe you are one of the 10 people who liked it) then you are probably familiar with the scene that this photo is from. Myra (played by Raquel Welch Welch) sort of tries to make a man of the young man that she was experimenting with in this scene.

Gorgeous Celebs_ 'The Best of Raquel Welch'

Source:Radaris– Hollywood Goddess Raquel Welch in Myra Breckinridge (1970)

I think this photo is from an ABC News interview (just from looking at the background) that Raquel Welch did with them, perhaps back in 2010 or 11. But the video that this photo is from is not currently available online right now, otherwise the link for it would be on this blog.

Raquel Welch

Source:The New Democrat– Hollywood Goddess Raquel Welch.

There hasn’t been a better looking woman since Marilyn Monroe died than Raquel Welch. That’s how high she stands out, a hot sexy baby who at 74 years old still has those qualities. Who can sing, dance, act, make people laugh and even right while doing those things. She’s gift from heaven down to men because of all of those traits, that is a national treasure that always commands respect.

And she’s still going strong and still does not look like an older women, senior citizen who has been eligible for Medicare and Social Security for what nine years now. Why, because she’s still a hot, baby-face goddess who takes care of herself and doesn’t want to look old or go old and as a result keeps providing men with countless images of her that a man with Alzheimer’s disease couldn’t forget even if they wanted to. And leaving women young enough to be her daughter and even granddaughter jealous as a result.

Posted in Hollywood Goddess, Raquel, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Otto Preminger: The Man With The Golden Arm (1955) Starring Frank Sinatra & Kim Novak

The Man with the Golden Arm

Source:TCM– Chairman of the Board Frank Sinatra and Hollywood Goddess Kim Novak.

Source:The New Democrat

“In the late 1940s, Frankie Majcinek, who is known as Frankie Machine, returns to Chicago’s South Side, which is mostly inhabited by Polish Americans, after serving a six-month sentence at a federal narcotics hospital. The denizens of Antek’s Tug `n’ Maul Tavern, Frankie’s favorite bar, are pleased to see Frankie, especially his best friend, “lost dog finder” Sparrow. Although Frankie’s former drug supplier, Nifty Louie Fomorowski, offers Frankie a free “fix,” Frankie refuses and vows to Sparrow that he has kicked narcotics for good and intends to become a drummer for a big-name band. Frankie proudly shows off the drums he was given at the hospital, and after sending Sparrow to find him some new clothes, goes to the roominghouse where he lives with his wheelchair-bound wife Zosh.”

“Frank Sinatra was overpaid to be able to work with Kim Novak. The pleasure was all his to be able to work with a hot sexy baby like Kim that he got to work with and see everyday. Who was also a pretty good actress and I’m sure Kim liked Frank as well. Not putting down Frank’s ability as an actor, because I think he was a hell of an actor, but just seeing a working with Kim everyday would be enough incentive to work with her.”

You can read the rest of this article at TCM

“1955 The Man With The Golden Arm Official Trailer 1 Otto Preminger Films”

1955 The Man with the golden arm Official Trailer 1 Otto Preminger Films

Source:Klokline Cinema– Hollywood Goddess Kim Novak and Chairman of the Board Frank Sinatra.

From Klokline Cinema 

Frank Sinatra was overpaid to be able to work with Kim Novak. The pleasure was all his to be able to work with a hot sexy baby like Kim that he got to work with and see everyday. Who was also a pretty good actress and I’m sure Kim liked Frank as well. Not putting down Frank’s ability as an actor, because I think he was a hell of an actor, but just seeing a working with Kim everyday would be enough incentive to work with her.

If you’ve seen the movie Pal Joey and are familiar with that, which I saw again last week, this movie is fairly similar to Pal Joey. Except Frank is already sort of a made man in the entertainment business in the sense that he’s already successful.

In The Man With The Golden Arm, Frank plays an up-incoming musician who hasn’t made it yet, who has a checkered past including doing time. And has to do other things to pay his bills including gambling.

Frank also plays a drug addict in this movie, when in Pal Joey he was sober basically the entire movie. But in both movies he meets Kim Novak who is an entertainer herself working at local clubs and they get involved in both movies. Except in Golden Arm, Kim saves Frank from his addiction and helps him get cleaned and then they get involved. This time the woman saves the man in the movie.

Posted in Classic Movies, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Movie Clips: Vertigo (1958) Let’s Wander Together

.
Source:The New Democrat

I could simply listen and watch Kim Novak until Israel and Palestine came to peace and agree to a two-state solution. There’s just something about her voice and those eyes and cheeks that just makes me want to go “aw, she’s so sweet and sexy”. Angie Dickenson who is from the same generation as Kim has the exact same effect on me. And not only that, but her movies were really good and she worked for and with great people like Jimmy Stewart and Alfred Hitchcock. So you got to see her in great roles.

This scene right here is just coming after Madeline spending the night or a big part of the night at Scottie’s apartment in San Francisco the nigh before. They were complete strangers, but she fell into the San Francisco Bay and Scottie rescued her and brought her back to his place. He was paid by her husband to follow her because the husband claimed to be worried about her mental condition. What Scottie wasn’t aware of was that a lot of this was part of a big act that the husband was setting up to cover up a murder. And they were using Scottie in this process.

Posted in Classic Hitch, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Beyonce Knowles: Proud to be An American, God Bless the USA

Source:The New Democrat

I like the Beyonce version of this great song more than the Lee Greenwood version of this song that is 20-30 years older. And not because the Beyonce version is more current. But I’m just more of an R&B fan than a pop fan, but both singers do a great job of honoring I believe at least the most important Americans that we have which is our military veterans. And the people who defend our freedom risk their lives to protect our freedom and in too many cases give their lives. And leave their families back to defend our freedom.

Which is what Veterans Days is all about and something that only the anti-military Far-Left and to a certain extent Libertarian-Right in America can’t seem to grasp. And if anything tend to see our military as part of the problem in defending peace and fighting for peace and defending our freedom and this is really the nice way of putting how the anti-military Far-Left and Libertarian-Right in America tends to look at the American military.

Veterans Day is not just an extra day off or a three-day weekend in a beautiful time of year when people want to be outside at the park or at football games, cookouts and so-forth. But it is the day that we donate to our military veterans where we honor them with songs and performances. And parades and ceremonies and where we honor the great Americans who fought for our freedom. Whether they are still with us or have already given their lives to fight for our freedom or time has simply come for them to rest in peace.

And this is why since 1918 after World War I that we take a day out of our year to give to the veterans who have given their lives to serve our country by defending it and is something that not many Americans do considering how large our country is. Which is why it is even more important that the three-hundred plus Americans who haven’t served in our military I believe even have a bigger debt to the veterans who have served us.

So instead of looking at Veterans Day as another day in the year where we do not have to work as Americans. Look at it as a day where we honor the men and women, fathers and mothers. Grandfathers and grandmothers, uncles and aunts, brothers and sisters who have served our country. By defending our freedom and look to pay back some of that huge debt to them. By thanking them for their service and remember that we only have this day off because of them.

Posted in Life, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Movie Clips: Vertigo (1958) Starring Jimmy Stewart & Kim Novak

.
Source:The New Democrat

I wouldn’t say that Vertigo is a great movie, especially not a great Alfred Hitchcock film. There are at least three others and probably more Hitchcock movies that are better. North by Northwest my favorite, Rear Window and To Catch a Thief and I’m sure others are definitely better than Vertigo. Vertigo is not Kim Novak’s best movie either. But Kim Novak and Jimmy Stewart made Vertigo a very good and entertaining movie almost by themselves by how they worked together and the chemistry they had.

Vertigo does have a very good plot. Jimmy Stewart plays a former San Francisco police detective who is now in semi-retirement. His old buddy from I believe college gets a hold of him with a job for him, but now as a private detective. His old friend who hasn’t seen a long time is a very wealthy San Francisco businessman who has a gorgeous baby-face goddess of a wife in Kim Novak. He wants Stewart to believe that his wife is going crazy and wants her to tail her to see what she does during the day.

What Stewart’s character isn’t aware of is that this couple is using him and is in on a murder plot. They want Scottie played by Stewart to think that Madeline played by Kim Novak is dead. When the fact is she is alive and well and comes back in the movie playing another character that just happens to meet Scottie. And Scottie is blown away by her because of the incredible resemblance and falls in lover with the same women again. A very interesting and good movie, but certainly not the best Hitchcock movie.

Posted in Classic Hitch, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Noam Scheiber: ‘What My Book Got Wrong About Obama, Summers, Geithner, Recovery’

The Escape Artists_ How Obama's Team Fumbled the Recovery (2012) - Google SearchSource:Amazon– left-wing columnist Noam Scheiber’s 2012 book about President Barack H. Obama.

Source:The New Democrat 

“The widely acclaimed and newsbreaking account of President Obama’s campaign to rescue America from its recession: inside the meeting rooms, the inboxes, and the minds of the pedigreed propeller heads who guided America through a worldwide crisis.

DEEP INTO THE OBAMA PRESIDENCY, THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE WAS PAINFULLY HIGH, THE GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR HAD WIDENED, AND THE STIMULUS HAD NOT DONE ENOUGH TO BRING JOBS BACK.

WHAT WENT WRONG?

FACING THE WORST ECONOMY SINCE THE 1930S, President Obama hired a crack team of escape artists: financial wizards who had pulled off numerous whiteknuckle getaways during the Clinton era. But this time, they fell far short. The Escape Artists reveals why.

Star White House journalist Noam Scheiber delivers a gripping narrative of the Obama presidency and the mistakes and missed opportunities that kept his pedigreed team from steering the economy in the right direction. With previously undisclosed internal documents and extensive, original reporting from the highest levels of the administration, Scheiber reveals how the very qualities that made these men and women escape artists in the 1990s ultimately failed them.

The Escape Artists” is a compelling narrative, deeply reported and beautifully written.” –Jonathan Chait, “New York”

“”The Escape Artists” offers great insight into Obama’s self-perception. . . . Scheiber’s reporting has naturally sparked a great deal of second-guessing in Democratic circles, and his book will provide plenty of ammunition for the president’s liberal critics . . . [and] to those critics on the right who believed that the White House never really earned their trust.” –Reihan Salam, “The Daily”

“The Escape Artists” reads like a Bob Woodward book–albeit better written and informed by a more sophisticated understanding of economics and policymaking.” –Daniel Gross, Yahoo! Finance

“A Woodwardian account of infighting in the White House’s economics team . . . Scheiber is a smart, clear-eyed reporter who frames his arguments elegantly.” –“Bloomberg Businessweek”

“Diligently reported and informative.” –John Cassidy, “The New Yorker”

“Noam Scheiber offers a persuasive take on administration policymaking . . . [and] provides a template for future administrations–even a future Obama administration–to avoid the trap of thinking too narrowly and too politically in a crisis.” –Matthew Yglesias, “Slate”

“Scheiber writes with ease and authority about complicated financial matters . . . and proves particularly adept at showing how [the Obama economic team’s] personalities, philosophies and previous experiences with one another shaped their interactions and the policy-making process.” –Michiko Kakutani, “The New York Times”

“What Scheiber offers is a judicious, nuanced and ultimately . . . persuasive chronicle of how contentious experts jockeyed to influence a young president stuck with an almost impossible set of chal-lenges. . . . Such sophisticated analysis of how the nation’s most powerful officials think–however one regards the wisdom of that thinking–distinguishes Scheiber’s book.” –Paul M. Barrett, “The New York Times Book Review”

About the Author
Noam Scheiber is a senior editor at The New Republic, writing about politics and Obama administration economic policy. He has written for the New York Times, The Washington Post, New York magazine, and Slate and has appeared on CNN, CNBC, MSNBC, and NPR. He lives in Washington, D.C.”

From Amazon

There’s always been this feeling on the Far-Left in America (mostly Democratic Socialists) that Barack Obama is not even a Democrat, at least not ideologically, let alone a Progressive or Progressive Democrat. MIT Professor Noam Chomsky has called Barack Obama a moderate Republican (if you can believe that) whose is the same ideological mode as a Richard Nixon or Nelson Rockefeller.

Noam Scheiber, even though he might be moderating now, is in that same left-wing, partisan camp, as the Noam Chomsky’s of the world and a lot of the writers at the New The New Republic, which is now just another version of the socialist The Nation Magazine, as well as a lot of the commentators over at MSNBC, or Democracy Now, and other left-wing media organizations in America, that have a real following with American leftists.

The 2009 stimulus debate, to deal with the Great Recession that took over and almost destroyed the American economy in 2008, is the perfect example of how the Far-Left, including left-wing Democrats like Noam Scheiber, feel about President Obama.

In early 2009, people who perhaps are even to the left of Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders (the only self-described Socialist in the U.S. Congress) saw this debate as the perfect time and opportunity for the Obama Administration to completely rework and remake the American economy.

American Socialists in 2009 believed that what America needed was an economic revolution and remake the American economy like Europe, replace the American capitalist system with a European social democratic system, where a lot less was expected of Americans to produce for themselves, because now the Federal Government would have a lot more responsibility and power to look after everyone’s well-being for them.

If you think about it, the 2009 stimulus debate and what Socialists were saying about President Obama and his administration, is not that different from what President Franklin Roosevelt and the flack and advice that FDR was getting from American Socialists and Communists in the 1930s during the Great Depression, that produced the New Deal.

Another thing that the Roosevelt debate has in common with the Obama debate of 2009, is that neither President was trying to end American capitalism or liberal democracy. They certainly weren’t trying to replace our economic system or form of government with anything. They were simply trying to save American capitalism and liberal democracy.

In both debates and both eras (the 1930s and 2009) you had people on the Right saying that the Federal Government shouldn’t do anything, because these things happen in a capitalist system and that the government should stay out and the let the economy fix itself. With the Far-Left calling for economic and political revolutions to remake the American economy and our form of government. With FDR and now President Obama basically saying (to use an old Bill Clinton line) there’s nothing wrong with America that can’t be fixed with what’s right with America.

The main reason why the Far-Left in America has never liked Barack Obama, at least since he’s been President, because he never became the Socialist that they thought they were getting when they three all their political support behind him in 2007-08, instead of supporting Dennis Kucinich or some other Far-Left Democrat. That’s why they don’t like him and see him as traitor, Uncle Tom (to put in in racial terms) a corporatist, etc, not as a good Democrat that they can love and support.

Posted in Book TV, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Hill: Mike Lillis: Time For House Democrats to Elect New Leaders?

Source:The New Democrat

Nancy Pelosi has been the leader of the House Democrats for the last twelve years. Eight of them after this Congress as Minority Leader and of course four of them as the first female Speaker of the House from 2007-11. She was also the first Minority Leader in Congress, House or Senate and the first party leader in Congress House or Senate as well. She’s been a very effective leader as far as fundraising and keeping her caucus united against things Democrats don’t want. And a very effective vote getter for things that needed to be passed even when compromises with more moderate Democrats and Republicans were made.

She’s had a very good run and time even with eight years as the Minority Leader. But at some point new leadership needs to come in to take the House Democratic Caucus to the next level. For them to get back to where they should be with well north of 200 seats in the House. After this election they may be under a 190 seats in the House and needing a wave in 2016 to win just win back the House with a small majority. She led them back from what was looking like a permanent minority party in the House pre-2006 when they won back the House of Representatives and guided them through the Tea Party revolution of 2010-11 and managed to win back some of those seats in 2012.

But now going into the next Congress House Democrats will be in worst shape then they were even in 2011 when Republicans took over the House and worst shape than they were in 2003 when Leader Pelosi became the Minority Leader under President Bush. The sky has fallen and the House Democratic Caucus has bottomed out and is going to look a lot different in the last two years of the Obama Administration. House Democrats already have good young leaders that could move the caucus through this period and hopefully back to the majority in the near future.

Leader Pelosi and her deputy Assistant Minority Leader Jim Clyburn and Minority Whip all have distinguished careers in the House and as Democratic leaders. But they are all in their mid 70s inheriting a younger more energetic, but much smaller House Democratic Caucus. I think they should all step down and let someone like Chris Van Hollen, Xavier Becerra, Jarred Polis and others step up and lead the House Democrats though this next period and hopefully back to the majority in the next two to four years and give the House Democratic Caucus a much different look and feel.
.

Posted in The Hill, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Real Time With Bill Maher: ‘Bill Maher Destroys Idiots Who Say Atheism is a Religion’

.
Source:The Daily Press

I don’t have a problem with people being Atheists, we have Freedom of Religion in the United States. Which means Americans have the constitutional right to believe or not believe in religion. But we don’t have the right to force our views on other people or force them into law. We have a Fist Amendment in this country, which is Freedom of Speech, but we don’t have a constitutional right to force others to go along with what we believe.

Which is something the Religious Right has never understood in this country. But is something that the Atheist Left doesn’t get either. It’s not good enough for them apparently that they have the constitutional right to not believe in God, but they feel the need to look down on and put down people who do believe who do. And that if anything that religion shouldn’t even exist in the United States, a country that is probably the most religious country in the West.

Mexico and Italy might come close on that. But we are very religious as a country, compared with Canada and Europe. And I guess Atheists feel outnumbered in America. Atheists tend to be progressive (socialist actually) politically, people who are supposed to be tolerant and open-minded. And yet they tend to have very little to no tolerance for people who believe in God, a bit of a contradiction.

As much as Atheists claim to have no faith, they seem to have a lot of faith in that God doesn’t exist. And there a lot of today’s Progressives in this country who claim to not believe in God, but also claim to be very spiritual. This is common in Hollywood and I don’t doubt that they are. But I believe there’s another reason with that. That being religious in this country especially among young people, where the decline in religion is very high, fewer Americans going to church or a House of Warship, but not being spiritual may come down as too elitist for a lot of people.

But not being religious at all, makes you seem like an elitist, someone who can’t communicate with the average folk so to speak. That you think you are better than everyone else because you feel you don’t need God or something. But if you are spiritual, you can sort of split the difference. “I don’t believe in God, but I believe in a higher power or something above myself”.

What we need in this country from the Religious Right and the Atheist Left, is instead of them trying to destroy each other, that they both realize that they both have a constitutional right to exist. That we do have a First Amendment in America that protects both Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion. And they would both do much better and be able to attract more followers in the future, because they would seem tolerant and reasonable.

Posted in Real Time, The Daily Press | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bill Maher: Be More Cynical on religion

.
Source:The Daily Press

Being cynical is probably a conservative boring way to live your life. Where you’ll end up taking less risks and you’re not putting your heart on the line very often. Not trying to sound gushy, but being cynical has its advantages as well. You’ll probably get burned and disappointed less, because you’re taking less chances. You’re not automatically going to take someone’s word when they say something.

For example when a member of Congress refers to someone from the other party as their friend, which happens all the time in the Senate, you’re not automatically going to assume Sen. Smith is friends with Sen. Jones or John McCain is friends with George W. Bush. Just because they say that, you’ll understand that they may just be saying that.

That’s how Washington works and when a member of Congress is referred to as a distinguished gentlemen or distinguished gentle lady, you know that they not be distinguished at all. Perhaps except for being a leader in Congress when it comes to fundraising, or bridges to nowhere where, or “bringing home the bacon”, that no one eats. Because no one lives or drives there, etc.

If you trust someone who has a good track record with you, they have sound judgement, etc and they invite out to treat you for dinner or will pick up the check, you know to take their word they’ll do those things. But when you offer them something to eat and give it to them, something they never had before and they taste it and have a horrible look on their face and they say it’s not good, chances are they are just being nice and don’t take that seriously. Truth and flattery are different.

The only advice I would give here, is take things in life for what they are. And don’t automatically assume everything you hear is the truth. Especially from people who need you for something. I would start with politicians, but anyone who needs something from you, when they do and say things that make sense and you know why they did it and understand it, great.

But if they do or say something strange that’s out of character and is something that’s not a good thing, for example let’s say you love playing tennis. And someone you know needs something from you. And they don’t have a clue about tennis and don’t even like the game and they start talking to about tennis, trying to express an interest in it, even challenging you to a match, don’t automatically assume they’ve become tennis fans.

They just might want you to believe that they are tennis fans instead, as a way to communicate to you. When they give you an explanation for it, unless it makes sense and adds up, don’t automatically assume they are saying what happened or the whole truth. Because they might only be saying what they want you to hear.

I know I’m a political junky and I have this pattern of using political stories to communicate broader points. But this is my last political story here. Politicians are the perfect people to be cynical about. If a white-collar politician comes to your state, hell let’s say running for President, why not and I’m not going to use a name here, a wealthy white-collar wine and Cheese yuppy politician, let’s say.

This person comes to your State and let’s say your state has a lot of blue-collar workers there, lets say Pennsylvania or Ohio. And this politician stops by one of your local taverns or bowling allies in Pittsburgh, to speak to your people. And this person comes to show you his bowling skills, trying to convince you he has some.

Or the white-collar limo owning and riding politician drinks beer to show you he likes beer, but generally doesn’t do these things, don’t automatically assume this politician is like you. But instead wants you to believe he is, to get you to vote for him. He wants your vote not to be friends.

The more you take things as they are and not just what you want them to be, the better you’ll be off if life. And I know that sounds unromantic and perhaps nonreligious, but what do you expect from an Agnostic anyway. Because you’ll always know or at least most of them depending on how intelligent you are, who is with you and who wants you to believe they are with you in order to get something out of you.

Posted in Real Time, The Daily Press | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mike Nichols: Primary Colors (1998) John Travolta As Bill Clinton

Movie Clips Classic Trailers_ Primary Colors (1998) John Travolta as Bill ClintonSource:Rotten Tomatoes Classic Trailers– Adrian Lester as Henry Burton.

Source:The Daily Press

“Primary Colors Trailer – Directed by Mike Nichols and starring John Travolta, Emma Thompson, Billy Bob Thornton, Kathy Bates, Adrian Lester. Jack Stanton is the charismatic governor of a southern state who decides to run for President. The film follows Stanton’s bumbling, philandering and plotting as he rises to the top of American politics.”

From Rotten Tomatoes Classic Trailers

“A man joins the political campaign of a smooth-operator candidate for President of the U.S.”

Movie Clips Classic Trailers_ Primary Colors (1998) John Travolta as Bill Clinton (1)Source:IMDB– Adrian Lester and John Travolta.

From IMDB

“Jack Stanton is running for president. The election is seen through the eyes of young Henry Burton. Along the way Stanton must deal with a sex scandal. Written by Anonymous”

Movie Clips Classic Trailers_ Primary Colors (1998) John Travolta as Bill ClintonSource:IMDB– John Travolta, Emma Thompson, and Adrian Lester.

From IMDB

I saw the movie Primary Colors in the spring of 1998. Doesn’t seem that long ago, but that’s a different story, with a long time friend of mine from high school who’ll go nameless. And we saw it for free because my friend worked at a movie theater, one of the few perks of being friends with him.

And I looked forward to seeing this movie, because it reminded me of a real life Southern politician another New Democrat, (the real Liberal Democrats) who is a political hero of mine, who had the ability and vision to do great things. But lacked personal discipline, made too many mistakes for someone with his intelligence, who also had a strong take charge attractive wife played by Emma Thomas. Who’ve could’ve been very successful on her own.

The question being, could Hillary Clinton’s husband be successful on his own? Same question in this movie Primary Colors was full of scenes that looked like the real person I’m talking about and if you’ve seen the movie and follow American politics, you probably already know who I’m talking about.

And the movie was also based on this real life person, liberal governor from the South who culturally fit in very well with his state and the broader region. Who didn’t have any Federal Government experience, not even serving in the military. Who despite being a Southerner, fit in very well with people outside of that region especially Northeastern and Hollywood Democrats who have a lot of power in the Democratic Party, if not run the party.

The main politician in Primary Colors the character played by John Travolta, great actor and a very funny man Governor Jack Stanton running for President, had the strong wife that I was talking about. Started running for President in New Hampshire with a very small budget and staff, just like the real life person.

Jack Stanton has a sex scandal that involved a long time friend of the Governor, had really smart political strategist also from the South played by Billy Bob Thornton. Again, long time friend of the Governor just like the real life person, veteran politicos as well a young people on his staff. Just like the real life person and there was a question of whether Governor Stanton evaded the Vietnam War Draft, just like the real life character.

There was a primary debate where Governor Stanton had a big moment to win the debate just like the real movie.

There was a campaign event, where Governor Stanton was able to connect with the audience his I feel your pain moment just like the real movie. When Governor Stanton basically told the audience that:

“I know times are tough, but I can’t promise you the jobs you lost are coming back. That it’s time that a lot of American workers go back to school and learn other trades”. Which also happened with the real life character.

And of course the comeback kid moment in New Hampshire where Governor Stanton does well enough in New Hampshire to keep his campaign going.

Of course the real life person I”m talking about is Bill Clinton who back in 1991-92, when he was running for President was Governor of Arkansas and was a Liberal Democrat ,but in the true sense. Progressive sure, but also understood the limits of government and the New Deal and Great Society. And that government has to be more responsible with tax revenue and of course all those situations that I just laid in the movie, actually happened with Bill Clinton or were very similar.

Very intelligent, but not very discipline, strong intelligent wife with Hillary Clinton.

Small budget and campaign in New Hampshire, memorable debate where he takes on Jerry Brown.

The campaign event where he feels the senior citizens pain and walks up to her and hugs her.

The sex scandal with Jennifer Flowers.

The story of whether Bill Clinton dodged the Vietnam War.

Great political strategist Jim Carville all of these things being true.

Primary Colors was based on Bill Clinton and his 1992 campaign for president where of course he was elected president. And also based on a book by author Joel Klein that was fictional with different names for the characters. But still based on a true story and they both did a very good job and this was a very entertaining movie.

Posted in Political Cinema, The Daily Press | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment