Passionate Patriots: ‘1968 DNC Nightmare in Chicago’

Passionate Patriots_ '1968 DNC Nightmare in Chicago' (1)

Source:Passionate Patriots– A look at Mayor Richard Daley’s Chicago.

Source:FRS FreeState

“Chaos before Hubert Humphrey’s nomination sets the modern standard for a harmful convention.”

From Passionate Patriots

1968 DNC

Source:TIME Magazine– chaos in Dick Daley’s Chicago.

The Democratic Party cost themselves the presidential election of 1968 and a chance to win the White House for a third straight time and 8-10 presidential elections, going back to 1932 with FDR. To go along with another Democratic Congress because of how divided they were on the Vietnam War.

A lot of that can be blamed on President Johnson’s handling of the Vietnam War, but this can also be blamed on the Far-Left flank of the Democratic Party that was anti-war, period. Even when we are attacked and they can take their anti-war feelings too extreme at times, as we saw with the 1968 riots at the Democratic Convention.

The New-Left in the Democratic Party doesn’t deserve all the blame here. The Chicago Police didn’t do a very good job of handling the situation either. And of course Richard Nixon being the master politician that he was, jumped all over on the Democratic division and moved himself to be a unity candidate. Which of course he wasn’t.

By the time President Nixon left office in August of 1974, America if anything was even more divided. 1968 was a crazy year with a lot of bad for the country with some good in it. But all bad for the Democratic Party.

A year where President Johnson announced he wasn’t running for reelection as President because of how unpopular he was. But even had he run for reelection, he would’ve had a very hard time getting renominated by a party that had moved away from him. And had moved into an anti-war socialist direction. That wanted to bring all of our troops home from Vietnam and use that money to build the country.

1968 was also a crazy year for Democrats who once they moved away from LBJ, the Far-Left flank of the party went searching for their own candidate to take on the GOP in the fall. First it was Senator Eugene McCarthy until Senator Robert Kennedy declared his candidacy for President. Then they threw all of their support behind him up until he was assassinated in June of 68. And then of the party went behind Vice President Hubert Humphrey, the establishment wing of the party.

But some New-Left support went back to Senator McCarthy, as well as Senator George McGovern. Another candidate from the Far-Left flank of the party. As it turned out even though 1968 might have looked like a fluke, it clearly wasn’t. Because in 1972 Democrats had similar issues. They were disorganized, didn’t have a clear leader with more divisive presidential primary’s and once again the Far-Left flank deciding who the Democratic presidential nominee would be Senator George McGovern taking on an establishment GOP Candidate President Nixon and losing 49 States in a landslide.

When the Democratic Party is united it tends to win and do very well. Because it’s bigger than the Republican Party and represents more people in the country. But when it’s divided like it was in 68, 72, 80 and 84, it loses very bad. Because a faction of their party doesn’t show up to the polls to vote.

Posted in FRS FreeState, New Left | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Associated Press: Representative Anthony Weiner: ‘Resigns in Wake of Sexting Scandal’

Weiner Resigns in Wake of Sexting Scandal

Source:Associated Press– U.S. Representative Anthony Weiner (Democrat, New York City) resigning from office because of his sexting habit.

Source:FRS FreeState

“Embattled New York Rep. Anthony Weiner is resigning from Congress, saying he cannot continue in office amid the intense controversy surrounding sexually explicit messages he sent online to several women. (June 16)”

From the Associated Press 

Today U.S. Representative Anthony Weiner, Democrat from New York, New York City to be specific, stepped up to the plate and hit a home Run. (Sorry for the baseball analogy for you non-sports fans) And did the right thing by resigning his seat in the House of Representatives.

As I’ve said before it’s not what Representative Weiner did that was wrong with his own private time, (well, his wife might disagree with that) and yes members of Congress do have private time, they are not always at work, just look at the U.S. Senate, (I rest my case: when do they ever work.)

It’s not what Representative Weiner did with his free time that’s the problem with me and a lot of other people. As a Liberal I could care less with what people do with their free time. With what Representative Weiner did is between him and his wife and their family if they have one yet.

It’s the consequences of the Weiner’s (you will excuse me) actions that are the problem, the fact of how public he alone made them by sharing them on Twitter and professional status that’s the problem. We are not talking about Joe Jones truck driver. (Not that there’s anything wrong with Joe Jones truck driver)

We are talking about a U.S. Representative and a member of Congress, a constitutional officer and a public official. The fact in today’s information age, what people do in public especially public officials, the whole world literally gets to see it. And in a way is all of our business whether that’s the right thing or not.

Because of the fact that we all have the ability to weigh in on it. As I’m doing now by blogging about it, but blogging is not the only way to weigh in on stories like this. WordPress, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, MySpace go down the line. And that’s enough plugs on my part, no wait I forgot my personal favorite Blogger.

Because of Representative Weiner’s irresponsible actions to post in public his affairs so to speak, the U.S. House especially the Democratic Leadership and the rest of the Democratic Caucus, are forced to deal with it in one way or the other. Either take questions about it, or take official actions, which is apparently what the House as a whole was preparing to do. Which is to file and investigation into the Weiner story. (The Big Weiner story) Politically this would be bad for everyone, House Democrats for having to deal with this story with hearings and investigations as well as the House GOP.

But it would be a huge distraction especially for the House Democratic Leadership who as of right now are in good position of retaking the majority in the House in 2012. And pushing their own agenda once they were to retake the majority. Thanks to House GOP mishandling of Medicare back in April, but the House Democratic Leadership were already breaking records in fundraising and recruiting candidates to take on the 62 Republican freshmen from 2010.

And the House GOP Medicare fiasco just reinforced that, but with the Weiner story, instead of concentrating on their own agenda they have to concentrate on Representative Weiner instead. So I’m glad Representative Weiner stepped up to the plate today and did the right thing and stepped down from office. Which I hope will bring and end to this story, which I think will continue, but at least he did his part to close this ugly chapter.

Posted in AP Video, FRS FreeState | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Kintaro Oe Video: ‘Woman In Boots and Jeans at The School’

The Daily Press _ Woman- In Skinny Jeans in Boots at School

Source:The Daily Press– woman in jacket, jeans, and boots, at school.

Source:The Daily Press

“Woman in boots and jeans at the school.” There was once a video about this with this photo on YouTube, but it has been deleted or blocked.

I love watching sexy women on the move especially when they are dressed sexy. I love watching sexy women on the move in tight Jeans, whether they are wearing denim or leather jeans and watching their legs move in those jeans. And I especially love watching sexy women in tight jeans with boots, under or over their tight jeans on the move.

I love watching their butt move in their tight jeans. I love hearing the sound that their boots make on concrete floors or sidewalks. Sexy women love being seen on the move looking like this and showcasing their legs and how they move. And the tight jeans with boots look is as good as it gets in doing this. Because they are tight and show what kind of legs women have.

Which is why it’s really important for women to make sure when they are wearing the tight denim jeans that’s right for their body. Especially their legs and butt. Because if they are well-built, strong legs with a tight curvy butt, they are going to be well highlighted. But if women are obese or rail thin, they are going to look real obese and rail thin in tight jeans.

Posted in Style, The Daily Press | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

I-Bob 1983: Sexy Blonde- In Jeans in Boots

Blonde girl in jeans and nice boots

Source:I-Bob 1983– Sexy Blonde, in jeans in boots. She obviously understands winter fashion.

Source:The Daily Press 

“Blonde girl in jeans and nice boots”

From I-Bob 1983

Here’s a tall gorgeous curvy sexy blonde that proves that the myth that all blonde women are rail-thin is a myth. Yes, blonde women have curves as well and this blonde is proud of hers and showcases them very well. In her tight denim jeans in leather boots. As well as a leather jacket. Gorgeous sexy woman that’s very proud of how she looks and wants the world to see it.

Skinny women to me aren’t sexy. I’m not interested in stereotypical valley girls or stereotypical rail-thin models. I’m not interested in obese women who’ve never missed and opportunity to eat or never turned downs seconds as well. I’m interested healthy women, women who take care of themselves. Who eat well, balanced meals who work out as well, who take care of themselves.

Healthy women to me are sexy women as you see in this video. Beautiful sexy woman in a very sexy outfit that combines both worlds of leather and denim into one very sexy package, a pleasure to check out. Tall gorgeous sexy blonde because she takes care of herself and is proud of that and lets the world see how healthy she is.

Posted in Style, The Daily Press | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The New Republic: William Galston- ‘Forward Thinking’

44th President of The United States

Source:FRS FreeState -Barack H. Obama: 44th President of The United States.

“What can Obama and congressional Democrats do about the bad economy?
Friday’s job growth numbers, reported by the Labor Department, present a sobering picture for President Obama and the Democrats. With the pace of hiring down and the unemployment rate above 9 percent, the report suggests that the nation’s recovery is once again faltering. These numbers only underscore our continuing economic difficulties. And for a mix of political and policy reasons, the federal government has no significant new fiscal or monetary weapons left to deploy. As they head into an election that is certain to focus on the economy, the administration and congressional Democrats have no choice but to put the best face on a bad situation. What can they do?”

From The New Republic

“…They needed to create jobs. Very frankly we’ve been here for four months without jobs legislation being offered on the Floor of the House of Representatives. What we’re rolling out today as we talk about creating job is a focus on job creators…

From House Democratic Leader Steny Hoyer

Whip Hoyer on CNBC Discussing the Economy, and Democrats' Make It In Ame_

Source:House Democratic Leader Steny Hoyer– Steny Hoyer: House Minority Whip, on CNBC.

During the 2012 general elections both presidential and Congressional, Democrats won’t be judged or blamed for the condition of the economy, when they won complete control of the Federal Government in 2008. At least by Independent voters. They’ll be judged by what they’ve done since. Especially the President and the job he’s done with what most people would say was a bad hand when President Obama took over in 2009.

House Republicans will be judged by what they did since they’ve won control of the House in 2010. So what the White House and Congressional Democrats will have to do to win back complete control of the Federal Government in 2012, or at least retain the White House and Senate, is to show they’re ready to govern again.

Democrats need to show American voters especially Independent voters, that the country is in better shape in 2012, than it was in 2008 when they took over. It’s really that simple. The Republican opposition might not have much to do whether Democrats win back complete control or at least retain what they have. Other than to communicate their message. If Independent voters feel the country is better off now, than Democrats will win back or retain power. If Independent voters feel the country is worse off in 2012 than 2008, then we are probably looking at a Republican White House and Congress going into 2013.

So especially with the bad jobs report Friday, with another increase in the unemployment rate of now 9.1% and only roughly 60,000 jobs created in the private sector. What democrats have to do is to communicate an economic message that tells the country: “we know the economy is bad and we have a plan to address it that will create economic and job growth. That will bring the unemployment rate down to a more acceptable level.” Even if they have no shot at passing that through the GOP lead House. But at least have something that they can take on the campaign trail in the 2012 general elections.

Democrats should say: “look, we have an economic agenda here. We tried to pass it out of the Senate, but the Senate GOP Leadership blocked it. Which is why you should reelect us there and gives us more seats in the Senate. But besides the House GOP would never pass it anyway.” And take that to the country.

Unfortunately there’s not much the Federal Government can do right now. The Federal Reserve has brought interest rates down as far as they can go. So the options are limited, but I believe good and good enough. But I believe an economic agenda that’s built around infrastructure, energy, trade and education, is the way forward for Democrats.

Especially as the GOP will focus on more tax cuts, deregulation and deficit reduction, Democrats should have an economic agenda that’s about infrastructure investment. The Core of Engineers says we need around 500B$ of infrastructure repairs. Something like a National Infrastructure Bank that would pay for itself, would take care of this and put hundreds of thousands of people back to work. energy a national energy policy that moves us towards energy independence and off of foreign oil. By promoting our own vast natural resources. More foreign trade that gets our products sold in foreign countries and brings down our trade deficit. That has trade adjustment assistance for people who lose their jobs as a result. So they can go back to work. And finally last but never least, education reform that’s built around public school choice and rewarding teachers for their quality of service, not time of service.

I believe with rising unemployment with weak economic and job growth, the strategy of no, saying no to whatever the House GOP comes up will run dry. At some point before the 2012 general elections, Democrats especially the President, are going to have to develop their own agenda. Because they are on the hook for what’s gone on the last four years for good or bad. And will be held accountable for it.

The issue that House Republicans will be facing in 2012 as well is that they’re the incumbent party in the House of Representatives. And will also be judged by what they’ve done in the last two years as well. So both parties, have incentives to show they can lead the country. And give voters reasons to vote for them.

 

Posted in Barack Obama Presidency | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Blondes in Boots: Women in Jeans in Boots

31326450765_4ec78958cb_o

Source: Blondes in Boots– Beautiful woman, in jeans in boots

Source:The Daily Press

“College girls in boots!”

From Blondes in Boots

I saw a video on YouTube a year ago of a beautiful sexy looking woman I guess out shopping for the day. Looking very sexy with a very tight body. She was about as sexy and well-built a woman as I had seen in a while. She looked great in a sweater, tight denim skinny jeans in black leather boots. Out shopping or that is what the video wanted to portray and she looked great.

This women knows she’s beautiful and sexy, knows she has a great body and how she looks in tight denim jeans. And is apparently very proud of that, I’m guessing so is her husband or boyfriend, who I believe shot this video. And I can’t blame her, she really knows how to get guys attention and why not. She is not ashamed or her sex appeal and why should she be, she’s obviously proud of it, as she should be.

I doubt it’s the only quality she has going for her. But physical appearance at least for sighted people is the first thing that we notice about people. Both men and women and she has a very sexy physical appearance, so why not highlight that. And with skin-tight blue denim jeans with her body and how they showcase her butt and legs.

Plus throw in a tight sweater and jacket and black Leather Boots. She did about as good of a job that could be done, in highlighting her physical sex appeal. Sexy women out for the day is a YouTube video I would suggest if you’re interested in sexy women that know and are proud of their sex appeal.

Posted in Style, The Daily Press | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Democratic Strategist: William Galston- ‘Democrats Play Better on Defense’

Harry & Mitch


Source:FRS FreeState– U.S. Senate Leader Harry Reid and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Source:The Democratic Strategist 

“Dec. 30 (Bloomberg) — William Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, and Veronique de Rugy, senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, talk about the outlook for Congress once it convenes in 2011.
They speak with Carol Massar on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart.” (Source: Bloomberg)”

Galston Says Republicans Will Push to Cut Spending

Source:Bloomberg News– Brookings columnist William Galston, talking to Bloomberg News.

From Bloomberg News

The Democratic Party strategy from the White House and Congress for the 112th Congress looks like to me to be a defensive strategy. “Let the House GOP go first on major legislation and then attack them and try to make them look bad. And bringing that legislation up in the Senate just to force the Senate GOP to go on the record.” If the Senate GOP votes in favor of House GOP legislation, then Senate Democrats have something else they can use against the Senate GOP. If the Senate GOP blocks or votes against the House GOP legislation, then that shows a divide between the House and Senate GOP. And just something else Democrats can use against the House GOP.

It’s all about politics right now for Democrats. “How to get President Obama reelected, how to keep control of the Senate and how to retake control of the House. And once again have all the power going into the 113th Congress.” The White House and Congressional Democrats don’t believe they have an agenda that they can sell to the American public, or that they can get out of Congress right now. With a GOP House and a large Senate GOP minority that can block anything. And neither party believes they can compromise, because they are worried about offending their fringes in their parties. And risking a primary challenge in 2012.

So the reason why the White House and Senate Democrats aren’t pushing any major legislation right now, is they don’t believe they can pass anything or get the sixty votes in the Senate to prevent the Senate GOP from blocking it. And they are expecting the House GOP to self-destruct on their own and don’t feel the need to counteroffer. House Democrats were whipped in the 2010 mid-term elections, losing over sixty seats and are no longer in power in the House. Senate Democrats, still in the majority, but no longer have a large majority. House Republicans feel they have the wind at their backs now and can force the Senate and President Obama to at least take stands on their policies. And we’ll see how far they’ll try to push their agenda that isn’t very popular even outside of the Tea Party. And at what cost to them.

Posted in Democratic Party, Originals | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sexy Dominican Girls: Ana Carolina Dancing

Attachment-1-1826

Source:Sexy Dominican Girls– Rear view of Ana Carolina.

Source:The Daily Press

“Ana Carolina Castillo 28” Originally from Sexy Dominican Girls, but the video has since been deleted or blocked on YouTube.

I love confident women who know they look good and sexy. Women who know that they are sexy and know men know they are sexy. And want the world to know that they are sexy and have the confidence to show people that they are sexy. I’m not talking about arrogance or women thinking they are more than they actually are. But beautiful well-built women who take care of themselves, who eat full-balanced meals and workout.

Not women who starve themselves or eat like there’s no more food around. But women who take care of themselves and have the confidence to show others how healthy they are. Sexy women to me love wearing tight jeans, whether they are denim jeans or leather jeans. Leather jeans on women being more popular in Europe than in America. Unfortunately from the perspective of an American man.

Tight jeans are a perfect way for a sexy woman to show off their body. Because they highlight their curves so much. But they have to be careful with them and make sure they are wearing the right pair of tight jeans, denim or leather. Because if they have an aspect they don’t want the world to see, if they are wearing the wrong pair of tight jeans, everyone will know.

Because of tight jeans highlight a women’s curves. Sexy women should have no problem showing the world how they look. Because they are sexy and a lot of people, especially men would like to see that. But if you are rail-thin, or you are lets say twenty-pounds or more overweight and even obese, you’ll look even much more so, especially if you are wearing skin-tight or skinny jeans.

Posted in Style, The Daily Press | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sandy Sticklake: ‘How Women Put on Tight Jeans’

Attachment-1-531

Source:Sandy Sticklake– Skin-tight jeans, or too-tight jeans?

Source:The Daily Press 

“How women put on tight jeans.” Originally from Sandy Sticklake before the video was deleted or blocked.

Thanks to revolution of tight designer dark wash denim jeans of the late 70s and into the 80s and with those style of denim jeans coming back in the late 90s and exploded even further in the last decade and has kept growing, sexy women in America and around the world now have another ability to show off their sex appeal. Especially with acceptance of tight and now skinny denim as a mainstream versatile pant. That can be worn in multiple ways and in multiple places.

You now see women wearing tight jeans to the office and not just on Casual Friday anymore. And we now see women wearing them with suit jackets and blouses. And of course with leather jackets and of course my favorite with boots, leather and suede. You see women wearing tight denim in boots and over boots. That first came into style in the late 70s, but came back in a big way six years ago and I don’t think that look is going away anytime soon.

Especially for the fall and winter, because denim is both a practical look, like in bad cold weather, but also very stylish and sexy. Men love sexy Women who wear tight denim on a regular basis. And women know this and apparently are more than willing to get our attention with them.
There are women who literally wear tight denim jeans everywhere and all the time.

The only thing about tight denim, especially as it comes to skinny jeans, is there’s not a lot of room for error with them. Women better being wearing the right tight denim jeans for their body. Because they are very revealing, just like skin-tight leather jeans. (Just ask Jim Morrison) So if you have something about your body, especially your lower body that you don’t want to reveal, skin-tight denims are not the pants for you.

Posted in Style, The Daily Press | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Brookings: William A. Galston: ‘President Barack Obama’s First Two Years: Policy Accomplishments, Political Difficulties’

President Barack Obama’s First Two Years_ Policy Accomplishments, Political Difficulties

Source:Brookings Institution– President Barack H. Obama (Democrat, Illinois) 44th President of the United States.

“Dueling Explanations for the Mid-term Election Results

During his first two years in office, President Barack Obama and his Democratic allies in Congress compiled a substantial record of policy accomplishment—the economic stimulus, bringing the financial system back from the brink of collapse, rescuing two automakers, universal health care, sweeping reform of financial regulation, and major changes in student loan programs, among many others. Nevertheless, the political standing of both the president and congressional Democrats slipped steadily through much of this period, and the voters administered a substantial rebuke in the November 2010 midterm elections. While some contests remain unresolved, the Democrats have lost at least six Senate seats, at least ten governorships, and more than sixty House seats, the most for a mid-term election since 1938. By any measure, this is a substantial and consequential expression of public discontent.”

Read the rest at Brookings

People all over the political spectrum have questioned where Barack Obama is on it. I’ve heard him described as a moderate Republican (Noam Chomsky) a Conservative and even a Neoconservative on foreign policy. All these labels coming from the Far-Left. I’ve heard him described as a Socialist by the Far-Right, of course.

As a Liberal myself, I think it’s clear that he’s not a moderate Republican. He clearly has respect for Republican leaders of the past and perhaps present. Like Ronald Reagan and today he’s friends with Senator Tom Coburn. They were friends in the Senate as well. But except for law enforcement issues maybe, he’s doesn’t believe in Republican ideology. Describing Barack Obama as a conservative or Neoconservative, is nonsense (to be too kind) otherwise he wouldn’t be a Democrat.

Barack Obama is clearly not a Socialist, his faith in the Welfare State is clearly limited. Which is the main reason I believe that Democratic Socialists in the Democratic Party aren’t happy with him. And have flirted with the idea running a candidate against him.

As a Liberal myself, I’m not satisfied with President Obama myself. I’m much liberal than him on social issues. Latest one, with allowing the government to look at innocent people s emails, reading habits, credit card records, etc. Apparently the President doesn’t have a problem with it and has taken the approach trust Uncle Sam, we won’t abuse this authority, well the problem with this.

To me the Barack Obama is clearly one of the most talented men and intellectually gifted Presidents we’ve ever had. As far as being able to understand the issues in front of him and understanding the issues. But similar to President Jimmy Carter, he lacks direction and even though he almost always comes down on the right side at the end, takes him much longer than it should to get there.

Barack Obama at me to at least is what’s called a Pragmatic Progressive (the real Progressive) someone who wants to analyze every situation first as best as can be done, before deciding what to do to fix the problem. But we’re not talking about a man other than someone who believes in progress and that government can play a constructive role in creating that progress, who has any strong, long withstanding political philosophy that guides him.

Posted in Brookings Video, Originals | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment